In a move that has plunged Israel into uncharted territory, the country's parliament passed a
controversial law on Monday that has triggered massive protests from the opposition. Dubbed the
"reasonableness bill," this legislation aims to overhaul the judiciary and curtail its powers by stripping the Supreme Court of its authority to strike down government decisions deemed "unreasonable."
While the far-right government, led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, argues that the judiciary
has become too powerful and needs to be reined in, the opposition contends that the real motive
behind the bill is to weaken the courts and undermine their ability to hold the government accountable.
The implications of this sweeping legal reform remain shrouded in uncertainty, leaving both sides
grappling for answers. One thing is clear - Israel has never faced a challenge of this magnitude from its own government before. The new law was added as an amendment to one of Israel's Basic Laws, which form the backbone of the country's constitutional framework.
Until now, the Supreme Court had the authority to strike down regular laws that violated the Basic Laws, but it had never taken that step. Under the "reasonableness" bill, that power would vanish, leading to a constitutional conundrum. Several civil society organizations have already filed a petition asking the Supreme Court to invalidate the law, arguing that it contradicts the nation's Basic Laws. Opposition leader Yair Lapid also plans to file a petition in the coming days, putting the Supreme Court in a precarious position.
A key legal argument the top court could employ is that the legislation violates Israel's "core values," alleging that the amendment is undemocratic. However, the question remains whether the bill's provisions are authoritarian enough to warrant such a groundbreaking decision.
As the opposition gears up to challenge the law, tensions continue to mount across Israel. Mass
protests, labor strikes, and even dissent within the military have become prevalent. Growing numbers of
military reservists are openly refusing to report for duty, citing their opposition to the government's plan, thereby jeopardizing the country's war readiness.
In a separate show of protest, Israeli doctors launched a 24-hour strike, with many expressing their
intention to leave the country if the legislation stands. The government's response has been stern,
threatening disciplinary action against striking doctors and seeking legal measures to compel them to
return to work.
But the government's ambitions don't end with the "reasonableness bill." This legislation is merely the
first step in a broader plan to reshape the judiciary. More changes are in the pipeline, including major
alterations to the Basic Laws that would redefine the balance of power between the parliament and the
High Court of Justice. Additionally, the role of the attorney general would be split, and citizens' ability to
petition against government actions would be restricted.
Observers warn that these sweeping reforms could fundamentally undermine Israel's democratic
institutions. With no constitution to safeguard the rights of the people, the Supreme Court has been a
crucial bulwark, preventing the enactment of laws that could enable ultra-religious parties to dominate
the secular majority. The potential consequences of this judicial overhaul have sparked a crisis in the
country.
Prime Minister Netanyahu attempted to assuage the opposition's concerns by suggesting negotiations
during the Knesset's upcoming summer recess. He expressed hope for consensus on further legislation
by November. However, given the profound impact of the "reasonableness bill," achieving any
compromise will prove to be an uphill battle.
As Israel grapples with the far-reaching implications of this legal shake-up, the nation stands at a
crossroads. The outcome of these unfolding events will determine the future of its democratic
institutions and the extent of checks and balances on government power. With protests raging and
uncertainty looming, Israel's political landscape remains in flux.
∎
