The Election 2024: A Test for the Idea of India

The struggle for independence from the British was also combined with the struggle for the idea of India.

Alex Tuscano





The 2024 election is a test for Indians to choose the nation, India, they want. From the emergence of the movement for freedom from the British Raj, the people of India did not only want freedom from India but also wanted India according to their idea. By 1930, it had become clear that three different ideologies dominated in defining the Idea of India.

1. Left ideology: In 1922, the Communist Party of India was started. Along with it, other leftward ideologies emerged. We mention here only one, i.e., the Socialists. For convenience's sake, I would like to put these two under one title, the "communist-socialist ideology." Those who vouched for this ideology wanted India to be a socialist country, very much in line with the Soviet Union or the United Soviets of Socialist Russia. After independence, the communist party split into two, the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India Marxist (CPIM). The CPI was close to the Soviet Union and was guided by it. The CPIM was inspired by and guided by the Communist Party of China. Both the CPI and CPIM were fundamentally secular parties.
2. The second ideology was represented by those who sponsored the idea of India as a Hindu Rashtra. They believed that there were two nations in India, one Hindu state and another Islamic state. It was represented by Deendayal Upadhyaya, Shyama Prasad Mukherjee, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, Madhav Sadashivrao Golwalkar, and the like. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee was the president of the Akhil Bharatiya Hindu Mahasabha from 1943 to 1946. Keshav Baliram Hedgewar founded the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh in 1925. Vinayak Damodar Savarkar developed the Hindu Nationalist Political Ideology of Hindutva and supported the two-nation theory, endorsing the idea of India as a Hindu Rashtra. All these stalwarts of the Hindutva ideology were Brahmins, and they advocated the Manu Smriti as the guide to the politics of India.
3. The third major ideology advocated a secular, democratic, and socialist India. This ideology was advocated by the bulk of freedom fighters who were leading the freedom struggle, such as Mahatma Gandhi, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, Babasaheb Ambedkar, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, Subhash Chandra Bose, Maulana Mohammad Ali Jauhar, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, among others. The defenders of this ideology had been the leaders of the freedom struggle. Scores of people gave their lives in the freedom struggle, and many spent ten to twenty years in jail. Incidentally, none of the advocates of the Hindu Rashtra found themselves on the list. They sided with the British rule on occasions of several struggles and boycotted the Quit India movement. The Hindu Rashtra proponents considered Muslims as their biggest enemies, more than the British. In 1939, the Hindu Mahasabha, under the leadership of Savarkar, formed an alliance with the Muslim League to form governments in many states. The struggle for independence from the British was also combined with the struggle for the Idea of India. In this struggle, the people who fought for a democratic, secular, and socialist India used the language of love and non- violence. Mahatma Gandhi was the icon of this approach. He was deeply committed to the principles of non-violence and non-retaliation. However, those who wanted to build a nation based on the ideology of Hindutva used the path of violence. They went to the extent of killing the icon of the idea of a secular, democratic, socialist India, Mahatma Gandhi, who was a deeply religious Hindu and secular in politics. His life is proof that one can be a deeply religious Hindu and yet secular in politics. Nathuram Godse, who was brought up on the hate- filled RSS ideology and under the guidance of the Hindutva ideologue Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, killed Mahatma Gandhi while he was at prayer with a large number of people. The last words from the dying Gandhi were "Hey Ram." Finally, this struggle concluded by adopting the Constitution of India, drafted under the leadership of Babasaheb Ambedkar. The Constitution is the summation of the freedom struggle and an endorsement of India as a secular, democratic, and socialist country. Today, after seventy-five years, India seems to be again at a crossroads between India as a Hindutva nation and India as a secular, democratic, and socialist country.

We have already seen the BJP-led NDA government in the past. There is a clear plan in the minds of Modi and the BJP to change the character of the nation. It is not necessary to enumerate all the indicators of this plan. A few glaring facts would be enough to see what Modi as the Prime Minister and the BJP-RSS conglomerates are heading towards.

1. Their outlook towards minorities as a whole and Muslims in particular, targeting Muslims and bullying their properties, denying them the right to marry girls or boys from the Hindu community and declaring such marriages as "love jihad," determining what they should eat and wear.
2. Their attitude towards Dalits and Adivasis.
3. The growing incarceration of those who dare to question the government, such as journalists, human rights activists, and those who fight for the rights of Dalits and Adivasis, branded as "anti-national" and "urban Naxals," put in jail without charge sheets and trials. The Bhima Koregaon incident will go down in history as a mark of fascist treatment.
4. Erosion of the independence of constitutional bodies, such as the Judiciary, Reserve Bank, Election Commission, the press, the Enforcement Directorate, Central Bureau of Investigation, National Investigating Agency, and Income Tax authorities. These investigating bodies have been made agencies of the ruling parties, directed to go after politicians of opposition parties.
5. Lower court judges would not grant bail out of fear of government action. The Enforcement Directorate, CBI, and Income Tax authorities have singled out leaders of opposition parties and put them in jail without evidence. These bodies have put even sitting and former Chief Ministers in jail.
6. The Election Commission, one of the most important constitutional bodies to ensure fair and clean elections, has been compromised. It has been working at the pleasure of the Prime Minister. It has been further made redundant by amending the process of appointing members to the Election Commission. Earlier, there were three members of the body who selected the Election Commission members: the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, the Leader of the Opposition in Parliament or Rajya Sabha, and the Prime Minister. With the latest amendment, the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court has been replaced by a cabinet member of the government appointed by the Prime Minister, literally giving the government all power to appoint an Election Commission of their choice. This has given unlimited power to the members of the EC, who will ensure the ruling party has enormous benefits in the election process.
7. "Congress-mukt Bharat" and "Opposition-mukt Bharat," promoting the idea of one nation, one party, one election, one religion, and one language. 8. Talk about rewriting the Constitution of India. While Modi is distancing himself from this move for the sake of the election fallout, he does not act against those BJP leaders going around proclaiming their goal of changing the Constitution.

If one takes note of the way the Modi sarkar is going about, the Constitution has already been rendered redundant. They have compromised the independence of the press, the fourth pillar of democracy. Anyone who criticizes the government has been hounded and put in jail. Some have even been killed, like Gowry Lankesh and Narendra Dhabolkar. The mainstream news channels have become "darbari channels." They do not raise any questions to the government, let alone criticize government policies. The only interviews Modi has given to journalists are like the one with Akshay Kumar, who could ask Modi how he eats mangoes and why he does not get tired, etc. During his interview with Karan Thapar, Modi walked out, probably because he was facing uncomfortable questions. Instead of a free media, we have what is called "Godi Media," where Arnab Goswami shouts his lungs out. Dhruv Rathee has come out with a bold YouTube video on February 22nd, 2024, which speaks about how India is moving towards a dictatorship.

The BJP-led NDA came to power riding on the allegation of corruption in the UPA government. Anna Hazare led this movement against corruption. During the legal proceedings, the court The BJP-led NDA came to power riding on allegations of corruption in the UPA government. Anna Hazare led this movement against corruption. During the legal proceedings, the court declared that there was no evidence presented to convict the people accused of corruption. Most of the people who were leading this 'India Against Corruption' movement have found themselves in the BJP. Modi has been declaring that he will not take bribes nor will he allow anyone to take bribes ("Na kahunga, na khane dunga"). But on the other hand, politicians from opposition parties who had cases of massive corruption were admitted into the BJP, and all these cases against them have been withdrawn - making the BJP a "washing machine." The BJP party itself has been involved in scams, one among them being called 'electoral bonds.' The electoral bond has been proved beyond any shred of doubt to be the world's biggest scam. It was legalized corruption. It was introduced in Parliament as a money bill to avoid having to go through the Rajya Sabha. The Supreme Court declared it unconstitutional and abolished it.

Jairam Ramesh has given an interesting description of it. According to him, it is a corruption of four types:
1. "Chanda do dhanda lo" (give a donation to the BJP party and get government contracts - prepaid bribes).
2. "Dhanda lo rishwat do" (Get a government contract by paying a bribe).
3. "Corruption karo, hapta do" (If caught in corruption after ED and IT raids, give a share and continue in the corrupt business). There were several business companies against whom there were ED and IT cases; these cases were canceled soon after these companies gave donations to the BJP through electoral bonds.
4. Shell companies giving donations (donations through electoral bonds from companies that exist only on paper). The shell companies' donations are a way of routing donations from big companies like Adani, who do not want their names to appear on the electoral bonds. The BJP has collected Rs. 8,250 crores through electoral bonds. The analysis of the data on donations given through electoral bonds indicates that companies running at a loss have purchased electoral bonds and given donations to the BJP. 1,297 donors gave Rs. 42 crores to the BJP, but their addresses are not available.

The greatest threat to the nation is not so much from these massive corruptions of Modi and the BJP. The greatest threat to the nation is the ambition of the BJP as a whole and of Modi, in particular, to change the character of the Indian state from a secular, democratic, and socialist state to a Hindutva state. BJP members are talking about changing the Constitution. They have openly declared that if the BJP gets 400 seats in Parliament, then along with the support of allies, they can easily change the Constitution. Hence, their campaign slogan is "UP ke bar 400 par" (After UP, 400 seats). The BJP will not let any stone unturned in getting more than 400 seats in Parliament.

This election is the last chance for the citizens of India to save the nation. According to leading political commentators, if the BJP comes to power for the third time, there would be no elections in the future. This is the last chance for all freedom-loving citizens of India to save the nation from collapse.